Recent reports suggest that Eli Lilly, a prominent pharmaceutical manufacturer, has been embroiled in a class-action lawsuit alleging discriminatory hiring practices against older job applicants. The plaintiffs, who filed the suit in 2021, claimed that they had applied for sales representative positions at Eli Lilly but were rejected based on their age. They argued that the company favored younger applicants, despite their equal or superior qualifications for the job. According to the plaintiffs, Eli Lilly’s hiring policies and practices gave preference to younger employees, resulting in the disproportionate employment of individuals under the age of 40. They alleged that older sales representatives, who possessed the necessary qualifications, were systematically excluded from job opportunities, which were instead awarded to younger applicants.
One of the key factors cited by the plaintiffs was the use of a recruitment system that required applicants to be affiliated with a university or part of Eli Lilly’s internship program. This practice raised concerns about potential age bias, as it may have disproportionately favored younger candidates who were still in the early stages of their careers. Additionally, the plaintiffs claimed that Eli Lilly had an explicit strategy of targeting millennials and early-career professionals, further exacerbating the alleged discrimination against older job seekers.
EEOC’s Suit and Allegations
The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) also filed a suit against Eli Lilly, echoing similar claims of age discrimination in the hiring process. The agency alleged that a senior VP of HR and diversity at Eli Lilly had stated that the company aimed to have early career candidates comprise 40% of its new hires. This statement raised eyebrows and strengthened the allegations of age bias against older applicants.
The Eli Lilly lawsuit brings to light a broader issue prevalent in recruiting circles – age bias. Various studies and surveys have indicated that age discrimination is a pervasive problem in the job market. A recent survey by Resume Builder found that more than one-third of hiring managers admitted to viewing candidate resumes with age bias in mind. Additionally, 45% of respondents reported knowing colleagues who were similarly biased.
The impact of age bias on older professionals is significant. A survey conducted by WerkLabs revealed that 75% of professionals over the age of 40, who experienced age bias, encountered it during the job search process. This discrimination not only affects their career prospects but also takes an emotional toll on individuals who are eager to contribute their expertise and skills.
The EEOC has been actively addressing age discrimination concerns in recent years. The agency has focused on language used in job postings that implies a preference for younger workers. In one notable example, the EEOC alleged that a manufacturer turned down a candidate for a sales representative role because it was seeking “more junior” applicants. These enforcement actions highlight the need for companies to be mindful of their language and avoid perpetuating age bias in their hiring practices.
The Need for Change
The Eli Lilly lawsuit serves as a reminder that age discrimination remains a pressing issue in today’s job market. It calls for a collective effort from both employers and job seekers to create a more inclusive and equitable hiring environment. Companies should review their recruitment practices and policies to ensure they do not discriminate against older applicants based on their age. Job seekers, on the other hand, should be aware of their rights and report any instances of age bias they encounter.
While the details of the Eli Lilly lawsuit settlement remain undisclosed, it has shed light on the pervasive issue of age discrimination in the hiring process. The allegations brought forth by the plaintiffs and the subsequent EEOC suit highlight the need for a shift in mindset and practices within the pharmaceutical industry and beyond. It is crucial for companies to embrace diversity and inclusion, valuing the experience and expertise that older professionals bring to the table. Only by addressing age bias head-on can we create a job market that is fair and equitable for all.
The post Pharmaceutical Giant Eli Lilly Sued for Age Bias appeared first on The HR Digest.